As the 2024 election looms, one of the most debated policy proposals is the "No Tax on Tips" plan championed by former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris. This initiative, which aims to eliminate federal income tax on tip income, is designed to bolster the take-home pay of millions of American workers in the service industry. While the plan promises immediate benefits for tipped workers, its broader economic implications raise questions about long-term impacts on the U.S. economy. 

In the ever-evolving landscape of U.S. fiscal policy, this proposal has sparked a significant debate. Using IMPLAN’s economic modeling, we’ve examined the potential ripple effects of this policy on the U.S. GDP and employment across various industries.

The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget has estimated that this policy could initially cost the federal government $25 billion per year in lost tax revenue, potentially doubling to $50 billion annually as workers and employers shift towards classifying more income as tips. The assumption held in our analysis is that this loss in tax revenue would be offset by reduced federal spending, while households, benefiting from higher disposable income, would increase their spending.

Key Findings

Our analysis reveals a nuanced picture. The shift in spending from the federal government to households would result in a net annual GDP loss of approximately $15 billion. On the employment front, however, the policy could lead to a net gain of about 33,800 jobs nationwide. These seemingly contradictory outcomes stem from the different spending behaviors of the federal government compared to households, along with variations in the economic impact of spending in different industries.

For this kind of economic impact analysis, it is important to do net analyses wherever possible. Including the ripple effects, rather than just direct effects, provides a more comprehensive picture, allowing us to better understand the full range of consequences—both positive and negative. This approach is essential for informed decision-making, as it reveals the interconnectedness of the economy and the potential trade-offs that might be overlooked in a simpler analysis. IMPLAN’s ability to model these complex dynamics makes it an invaluable tool for policymakers and stakeholders.

The GDP Trade-Off

One key factor contributing to the net loss in GDP is the nature of federal spending. The federal government tends to allocate a significant portion of its budget to high-wage industries such as software publishing, data processing, and air transportation, where each dollar spent generates relatively fewer jobs per contribution to GDP. In contrast, households typically spend more in lower-wage industries like retail, restaurants, and housing, which create more jobs per dollar of contribution to GDP.

Additionally, our analysis incorporated a 3% household savings rate, consistent with recent averages from the Bureau of Economic Analysis. This means that the increase in household spending is slightly smaller than the reduction in government spending, further contributing to the overall GDP loss.

Employment Shifts: Winners and Losers

The impact on employment varies significantly across industries. The sectors that stand to gain the most are those heavily reliant on consumer spending. For instance, limited-service restaurants could see an increase of over 12,000 jobs, while hospitals and nursing care facilities might add approximately 11,000 and 10,000 jobs, respectively. Other significant job gains are expected in retail, real estate, and personal care services, reflecting the direct impact of increased household spending.

On the flip side, industries heavily dependent on federal contracts and spending would bear the brunt of job losses. The most affected is the federal government’s own non-military employment, which could see a reduction of over 200,000 jobs. Other sectors facing job cuts include computer systems design, insurance, and various specialized manufacturing industries like aircraft engines and space vehicle parts.

Benefits and Consequences

The proposal to exempt tips from federal taxation presents a classic case of economic trade-offs. While it may boost employment in consumer-facing industries, it comes at the cost of reduced GDP and significant job losses in sectors tied to federal spending. Policymakers will need to carefully weigh these outcomes as they consider the broader implications of this proposed policy on the U.S. economy.

The mixed results of this policy highlight the importance of considering both the short-term benefits and long-term consequences when making changes to the tax code. As this debate continues, further analysis and discussion will be crucial in shaping a fiscal policy that balances the needs of workers, industries, and the overall economy.

This analysis provides a snapshot of potential economic impacts based on the assumptions and currently data available. As the policy evolves, so too will its implications for the U.S. economy.

Want to use IMPLAN for your own economic impact analysis? Schedule a demo today.